J.S. MIlls Essay - 818 Words

Individual Civilization nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In the final two chapters of the essay â€Å"On Liberty†, J.S. Mill discusses a few different subjects concerning individual civilization. The one example I believe is important begins on page 92. Here he discusses how he feels about society trying to help or change a way that someone has decided to live their life. The decisions they make and the actions that they do are completely up to the individual themselves. I will try to further examine the role society plays in a person’s civilization and what arguments Mill made to explain the situation. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In the first three chapters, Mill discussed when and why someone’s personal Liberties should, if at all, be taken†¦show more content†¦As long as there is no harm inflicted or threatening harm to others within the community, opposing figures should not have the right to invade a situation and try to control it. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;An example of this that Mill uses is a case of a man crossing an unsafe bridge. He states that if someone is crossing a bridge that isn’t safe and an officer or another person sees this, there isn’t time to warn of the danger. The person might be seized and turned back, without his liberties taken away. The idea is that your liberty is what you desire to do or feel. The man does not desire to fall into the river, so by withdrawing him from the bridge his liberties are not broken. On the other hand, no one knows why this person desires to take the risk of falling into the river. So, unless he is a child or someone who is incapable of making their own discussions (due to mental retardation), he should only be warned of the danger and not forcibly removed from the bridge (96-97). This would not be hurting his liberties. You are just conducting an expression of the danger ahead for the individual. If you forcibly remove the person, their liberties w ould be somewhat invaded. Before taking action of a situation, one should know all of the circumstances and facts. Maybe for some crazy reason the man wanted to fall into the river, then his liberties would be torn apart because the officer felt differently.Show MoreRelatedMoral Theories: Kant and J.S Mill1473 Words   |  6 Pagesprovides a better argument and can be applied as a universal moral code. The two moral theorists Immanuel Kant and J.S Mill have created two distinctly different theories on morality and how to develop a universal moral code. Both theories focus on intentions and consequences. Kant believes that the intentions and reasons of our actions can be measured and defined as morally correct, where as Mill believes that our intentions really play no role in morality, and that we should focus on the consequences andRead MoreEssay about Mill vs Dostoevsky1064 Words   |  5 Pagescompare J.S. Mill’s views on the social function of freedom with that of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s characters from both, the novel Notes From Underground and the excerpt; The Grand Inquisitor, also drawing supplementary arguments from Friedrich Nietzsche, while expressing my views alongside. Mill’s core assumption of man is that he is a rational being who will strive to maximize his own utility. â€Å"I regard utility as the ultimate appeal†¦ on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being.† (Mill. OnRead MoreWhat Type Of Power Can Be Placed Onto A Society And Its People1212 Words   |  5 Pages The purpose of J.S. Mill’s essay is to examine what type of power can lawfully be placed onto a society and its people. Mill sought to explore this topic because he recognized the continual development of society and how circumstances change as society rapidly becomes more civilized. The object of his essay, stated in his introduction, is to argue that self-protection is the only instance in which individual liberty can be interfered. In chapter four, Mills goes on to explore these limits on individualRead MoreThe Right Block Free Speech997 Words   |  4 Pagesshould go no farther than J.S Mill. J.S Mill held the view that there are more pros to promoting freedom of speech than there are in creating censorship. Mill believed that blocking freedom of speech itself was a form of blocking access to the truth. He believed that limiting free speech limits the formation of ideas into truth. â€Å"The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation† (Mill, On Liberty). WithoutRead More On Liberty Essay1088 Words   |  5 Pages Analysis amp; Critique of J.S. Mills On Liberty nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The perception of liberty has been an issue that has bewildered the human race for a long time. It seems with every aspiring leader comes a new definition of liberty, some more realistic than others. We have seen, though, that some tend to have a grasp of what true liberty is. One of these scholars was the English philosopher and economist J.S. Mill. Mills On Liberty provided a great exampleRead MoreAristotle s Views On Society2536 Words   |  11 PagesAristotle and J.S. Mill are two of the most well known philosophers who both believe that some pleasures are seen as higher or more desirable than others. However, do both their theories really relate to each other or is there a degree of conflict between them that reveals their difference in views? Although both Aristotle’s view along with J.S. Mill’s view may originate many years ago, they still have an impact on society today and what we can learn from them, especially in modern-day Canada. U ltimatelyRead MoreJohn Stuart Mills Work881 Words   |  4 Pagesprescription for medical marijuana is immoral and it is restricted in many states including Texas. In the section on liberty, John Stuart Mill introduces the harm principle. Mill believes that â€Å"The only legitimate ground for social coercion is to prevent someone from doing harm to others†. (John Stuart Mill handout, Principle 1). It means that everyone should have their own individual liberty to think as they satisfy unless their actions or decisions may not cause harmRead MoreThe Mill By John Stuart Mill1537 Words   |  7 PagesJohn Stuart Mill was a famous philosopher and historian. Jeremy Bentham who advocated for utilitarianism just like Mill influenced much of Mill’s works. Mill’s works were also greatly influenced by Jeremy Bentham’s brother, Samuel and Mill’s father, James. Mill had many early works prior to his writings on utilitarianism. Mill discusses how to determine right and wrong, but this seems to be an ongoing conflict. Mill believes that in order to prove goodness you must have ethical morals lined up inRead MoreJohn Stuart Mill s Utilitarianism Essay1381 Words   |  6 Pageswholly good, and that pain to the lone evil in the world, as he said, â€Å"Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as what we shall do.† Mill updated Bentham’s theory to add a sort of strata to pleasure. Essentially, what Utilitarianism follows is the greatest happiness principle, which states that one should always do whatever allows for the greatest amount of good for the greatest amountRead MoreThe Change Of The East India Company Monopoly1478 Words   |  6 Pageshe was in England, Say was confronted on the things he saw, the things he admired and those that he deplored. Still in England, Say was able to make crucial friendship networks with well-known economist such as, David Ricardo, Jeremy Bethem, James Mill and Thomas Malthus. At the time, he visited Glasgow; he got a chance to sit on the professorial chair of Adam Smith, and this marked an emotional period in his life. Without a doubt, his perspective of England could not go without observation and criticism